[Lain]

Si es un HDD, le pasaría [url=https://www.ccleaner.com/defraggler?cc-noredirect=]Defraggler[/url] por la noche para que compacte el disco y luego volvería a mirar qué arroja CrystalDiskInfo. Si sigue en amarillo, probaría a mirarlo con CHKDSK.

[Kumicho]

Cuidado compactando la información si es un disco en mal estado, porque empeoras las cosas.

[Lain]

Leches, es un fallo de sectores, no de que ha información esté muy fragmentada como pensaba. Según leo, a mayor número, mayor riesgo de fallo del disco, por lo que es conveniente realizar una copia de seguridad y no pasarle CHKDSK. Si el disco aún está en garantía, se puede descambiar.

[ChicoDeGoma]

Hombre, el fallo era "sectors reallocated"

iokse

sae

[Miauw]

respuestas en quora

chatGPT

Cita:Desktop-grade hard drives, also known as 3.5-inch hard drives, tend to be more reliable than laptop-grade hard drives, also known as 2.5-inch hard drives. This is because 3.5-inch hard drives have more space to dissipate heat and are more robustly built. However, it is worth noting that the reliability of a hard drive also depends on factors such as the brand and model, as well as how well the drive is maintained and protected.

humana más votada

Cita:Leaving “grade” out of this answer, 2½ HDD’s are in fact more reliable (and they are available in 7,200 RPM) than 3½ HDD’s. They are basically the exact same with two differences. Inertia and mass. There is less of both in a 2½ HDD. Therefore, less mechanical strain. This also applies to physical shock, not to be confused with electrical.

me he quedado igual